WebThis Court has ever since required of federal law officers a strict adherence to that command which this Court has held to be a clear, specific, and constitutionally required--even if judicially implied--deterrent safeguard without insistence upon which the Fourth Amendment would have been reduced to "a form of words." WebElkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960), was a US Supreme Court decision that held the "silver platter doctrine", which allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence illegally …
Adoption of a Federal Exclusionary Rule U.S.
WebIn its application to criminal cases, the Silver Platter Doctrine had a life span of 44 years, until Elkins v. United States (1960). In the meantime, the Court had begun to apply Fourth … WebIt has been called the “silver platter doctrine,” in recognition of the fact that law enforcement is handing over the evidence “on a sliver platter” to school officials. Another type of school search involves using metal detectors, either hand-held or walk-through devices. meijer south westnedge pharmacy
What landmark decision abolished the silver platter doctrine?
WebThe doctrine was so named because state officials were said to hand over evidence to federal authorities on a figurative silver platter, allowing federal law enforcement to use the evidence that was obtained by states in a 6 In Wolf v. Colorado WebThe silver platter doctrine is defined as the condition in which the state officials can transfer the case to the central officials. The collected evidences cannot be suppressed by the federal officials even though they are collected by an illegal source. WebThe silver platter doctrine has its roots in a series of Supreme Court cases from the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In these cases, the Court held that federal courts could admit evidence obtained by state or local officers even if it was obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. meijers party trays and platters